Stress and resiliency in the New Hampshire judiciary
Granite State judges reflect on findings of national report
Twenty percent of U.S. judges surveyed meet at least one of the criteria for depressive disorder, according to a 2020 report, “Stress and Resiliency in the U.S. Judiciary.”
The National Judicial Stress and Resiliency Survey, the largest of its type ever conducted, was designed by the American Bar Association Commission on Lawyer Assistance Programs. Out of 18,000 judges nationwide, more than 1,000 judges participated in the survey which took place amidst the covid-19 pandemic.
Some of the top sources of stress for judges, according to the report that appeared last year in the Journal of the Professional Lawyer, include: the importance and impact of decisions; a heavy docket of cases; unprepared attorneys; and public ignorance of the courts.
In New Hampshire, five courts that have jurisdiction over a wide variety of cases: the New Hampshire Supreme Court, the Superior Court, the Circuit Court Probate Division, the Circuit Court District Division and the Circuit Court Family Division.
David King, administrative judge for the Circuit Court of New Hampshire, said the stress and resiliency report reflects issues that are very similar to the ones the Circuit Court deals with every day.
“When I look on page 10 of the study where it speaks about sources of stress, they’re describing the Circuit Court to a T,” he said.
King manages the largest section of the New Hampshire court system, overseeing 31 judges and 375 non-judicial employees. As an administrator he has had to work on the fly over the past year, monitoring exposures to coronavirus, making decisions about which courtrooms need to be closed and what cases to reschedule.
“For me it’s not the search warrants or DVs (domestic violence cases), it’s, ‘we just found out that the husband of so and so in one of the courts just tested positive and do we need to clean the courthouse in the morning?’ Or a judge called and someone in their family has tested positive,” King said.
Still, he said he considers himself lucky compared with judges conducting hearings during the pandemic.
“I have more of an ability to close my eyes for a second between issues than those judges who are on the phone all day long. I can tell you from my regular communications with our bench, the amount of stress on the Circuit Court over the past 13 months is unprecedented. We’ve never seen anything like this before.”
The nature of cases that pass through the Circuit Court and the decisions judges make can be inherently stressful, King said. This is because many cases involve domestic violence, child abuse and neglect, as well as guardianship and custody issues.
“These types of cases need attention whether we’re in the midst of a pandemic or not. They all need to be handled in a timely fashion, but many judges have been working in isolation, oftentimes in the courtroom, doing telephonic hearings all day long.”
While, for judges, the importance of decision-making was the number one source of stress in the 2020 Stress and Resiliency report (79.2%), the number two source was heavy dockets (73.2%).
The Circuit Court in New Hampshire is authorized to have 45 full-time judges but it currently has 31.
“When you add that to the influx of cases, which hasn’t slowed down, it’s a recipe for burnout, it’s grueling,” King said. “We’ve got about 14,000 cases right now that need to be scheduled for trial in the Circuit Court and 3500 criminal cases scheduled around the state. That sounds like a huge number but we had 55,000 criminal cases filed in 2020.”
Isolation of judges
For Judge Susan Carbon, who serves on judicial conduct committee and the 9th circuit Family Division in Manchester, life as a judge has been busy over the past year.
“There has been no letup. This myth that things were quiet during Covid is one of the biggest myths I’ve heard,” she said, citing in-person and Webex hearings that have continued to take place. And this, she added, is coupled with the momentous decisions and responsibilities, as well as the persona that judges must maintain for the public.
“As a judge, you’re taking an oath to give every single case 110%. You can’t come into court and say, ‘Geez I’m tired.’ You may be tired, but the people you’re serving don’t deserve that, and if that’s your delivery you shouldn’t be on the bench.”
Carbon said she doesn’t experience the isolation spoken about by some judges in the stress and resiliency report because she has been in courthouses with multiple judges. But she acknowledged this can be a real problem for those on the bench in courthouses with only one judge.
Judge John Yazinsky, a Circuit Court judge in Sullivan County since 2001, said every judge experiences isolation in various ways.
“Sometimes it’s self-imposed, and sometimes it’s one of the practical aspects of the job,” he said. “It’s particularly difficult in a small county like Sullivan where there’s almost nowhere you can go that you don’t bump into someone you know or who has been in court in front of you. It requires a self-imposition of stepping back.”
This constant awareness of one’s public persona is part of being a judge, Carbon explained.
“You have to still remember you’re representing the court wherever you go. If I go for a run and I’m hot and sweaty I’m not going to run in to the grocery store like others might.”
Carbon mentioned a stalking encounter that led her to install an alarm at her home some years ago and another experience at a restaurant that she referred to as “very inappropriate.”
Yazinsky said he and his wife haven’t accepted an invitation to a holiday party or get-together for years because of the conflicts such gatherings may create.
“Particularly with hearing family cases, there’s always someone who knows someone, and people don’t always realize that judges can’t talk about cases that are in front of them.”
Judge Jennifer Lemire, who has a case docket of intricate divorce and parenting cases, said isolation was an issue for her early in her career.
“You find in those smaller courts that when you don’t have colleagues to run things by or just chat with or grab lunch with when you have time, it can really affect your psyche.”
The stress of making decisions
The number one source of stress that judges reported in the survey (79.3%) was the importance of the decisions they make in court.
Family court, Carbon said, is “probably the most stressful docket in the state.”
This is due to the high stakes that come with the decisions judges make regarding parental rights.
“There’s nothing more important than your kids, and when you’re the one making those decisions that are going to impact children in a profound way … I labor over those decisions because I know the consequences are so enormous.”
New Hampshire Supreme Court Justice Gary Hicks said getting decisions right presents a substantial pressure for judges.
“You’ve got to get it right – that’s the pressure,” he said. “It’s a cultural thing for us. We took an oath to be right all the time. It’s hard to think we could be right all the time, but that’s still the goal.”
Yazinsky described the decision-making process in court as the most stressful part of his job.
“It’s easy to divide property because people can replace property, but it’s difficult to make a decision that will have a lifelong impact on the people in front of you, as the article points out,” he said.
Echoing Carbon, the hardest decisions, he said, involve children, particularly abused and neglected children.
“Those decisions weigh on you because if you get it wrong a child can be injured. Any judge who has done a lot of abuse and neglect cases will have made a mistake and will get the call in the middle of the night to find out the child you returned is in the hospital because a parent has injured them. Those are the ones that can haunt.”
One of the stressors Lemire hears about often, she says, are overburdened dockets, as well as neglect cases that require judges to see graphic evidence of substantial physical abuse and neglect.
“That can be difficult. And terminating the parental rights is a decision that is never made lightly. I liken it to a criminal case where the standard is beyond reasonable doubt.”
One part of the study that made Yazinsky reflect, he says, was a section that described judges at the end of the day making harsher, more biased decisions, than at the beginning of the day.
“If you’re required, as we are, to hear 10 or 12 half-hour cases, and to have to act on all the emergencies that come in, and get orders out from three weeks before, by the end of day you’re absolutely exhausted. I reflected when I read that, and I thought to myself, ‘Am I conscious that this might happen, and do I make an effort to make sure it doesn’t happen?’”
One of things that Yazinsky became involved in during a time of particularly high stress was mindfulness and meditation.
“If you learn mindfulness, as the article suggests, and which many judges have adopted, you do take a step back. For me, when I feel the urge to get angry there’s the immediate reaction to simply concentrate on the breath.”
Yazinsky keeps a saying on his bench from Victor Frankl, the Austrian psychiatrist, philosopher and Holocaust survivor, that stares him in the face each day during hearings:
“Between every stimulus and response there is a space and in that space is our power to choose our response and, in our response, lies our growth and our freedom.”
“I really try to live in that space, and I’m not perfect,” Yazinsky said. “The struggle is that judges aren’t expected to have or show emotions, but we’re human beings affected by things just like anyone else. We have good days and bad days, but on the bench it’s a struggle on a bad day not to show it’s a bad day and I certainly haven’t perfected the art of it, but at least I can recognize it.”
Lemire said she keeps her ego in check by recognizing she is there to help those who come before her, and to not simply “wield authority and power.”
“A lot of those who come through our doors don’t have attorneys. It’s important that we recognize that we’re here to help them with whatever the issue is and to not simply wield authority and power,” she said. “Your patience can be tried by some difficult litigants or attorneys, or lack of evidence, or a busy docket. We have to be careful to remind ourselves that we’re here to help people. Sometimes you feel like a counselor.”
Carbon teaches about implicit bias through trainings she does for the New Hampshire chapter of Court Appointed Special Advocates, a national association in the United States that supports and promotes court-appointed advocates for abused or neglected children.
While rare, she said she has known of judges who are disrespectful to people by holding expectations that exceed what is reasonable, demanding that people do something because it pleases their fancy, or those who even flaunt their position by wearing their robes in public.
“I am very, very privileged, and I’m in a position that holds high public status. It would be very easy to abuse this position and I’ve seen judges do it all too often,” she said. “The law is always your framework but you need to listen and learn and realize that no two cases are the same. When working with people whose backgrounds are different from your own you have to be very mindful that you aren’t superimposing your values on other people. I train classes to be mindful of this.”
Hillsborough County Superior Court Judge William Delker said he enjoys the decision-making process but noted that some decisions are very challenging.
“I enjoy that part of it because it’s like a hunt for the right answer. One can look at the law and feel confident that the decision is based on principles of law,” he said. “Decisions about bail and sentencing, however, are incredibly challenging because there’s no obvious right or wrong answer and we’re often operating on incomplete information. In some cases, it can be a matter of life and death, or a person’s liberty, and those are monumental decisions.”
Fighting the temptation to send people to jail because it’s the easy thing to do has been something Delker says he is always aware of. Even when he has a defendant with a bad record there may be “some glimmer of hope.”
One case that stands out to him involves a woman he has worked with for three years trying to come up with creative solutions to her situation.
“This person who has been in front of me for three years is just a different person since I first sentenced her,” he said. “And it was not an easy decision to make based on her background at the time.”
All of the New Hampshire judges interviewed about the stress and resiliency report cited keeping busy, spending time with family and friends, as well as exercise, as the most important sources of well-being in their lives.
Lemire said she took up cycling with her husband and is looking forward to resuming a yearly trip with her family.
For Delker, who said he doesn’t typically stress out, staying busy is, itself, a source of wellbeing.
“I … like working,” Delker said, joking that probably not a good person to talk about work-life balance because, “I don’t really have one.”
“Unless I’m doing one of my hobbies, I feel like work is fulfilling to me, and I work best when I’m busy. I have periods when things are less busy, particularly over the past year we haven’t been doing jury trials. But I thrive best in that environment.”
Delker, who also teaches law school students, described the sedentary nature of being a judge as one of the aspects of his job that requires him to exercise. He goes to the gym three or four times a week and has a host of projects around his house that help him maintain balance.
“This job is so sedentary. I literally sit, get up, sit, and walk across the hall, and sit again. And that’s my job. I need to exercise,” he said.
Hicks said the one thing he has learned over the years regarding how to stay mentally healthy is the need to take time off.
“I’m not very good at it, but all judges need to take time off. It’s contrary to our nature when there are cases to be decided and work to be done but we need to do it. I find that after three or four days when I’m away I can breathe normally and it’s refreshing.”
While King said some judges are “getting burnt out” due to heavy caseloads and other concerns relating to the pandemic, there is hope in the air.
“People can see the light at the end of the tunnel. We can see that by late May or June we’ll be able to go back to some semblance of normal.”
This article is being shared by partners in the Granite State News Collaborative. For more information visit collaborativenh.org.