NH’s pandemic-scarred legislative session

A review of the bills that actually made it through
Altsch Legislature

NH House in session at the Whittemore Center at UNH. (Photo courtesy of Rep. Debra Altschiller)

What happens when the house is burning? Grab what you can — the rest will be left in the ashes.

Of course, New Hampshire‘s House of Representatives didn’t burn, but it was infected by the pandemic and partisanship. And, after members fled the University of New Hampshire’s hockey arena, the Senate tried to salvage what they could … or wanted to.

To put the 2020 session in perspective, the Legislature passed 61 bills this year. In 2018, the last non-budget year, 385 bills were passed.

Of course, that comparison is a bit misleading. Dozens of formerly dead bills were gathered up off the floor and packaged into huge omnibus bills, with some last-minute goodies stuffed in. The biggest of them — House Bill 1234 — was a package of 40 different measures.

But that left a lot on the table, to disappointment or relief, depending on who you’re talking to.

“A lot of what happened didn’t happen,” said David Juvet, senior vice president of public policy at the Business & Industry Association of New Hampshire. “It was kind of a screwy session. Everybody is trying to lick their wounds and come back in January to try to fix it.”

But the BIA isn’t necessarily waiting. It is urging the governor to veto some of the end results.

This session, New Hampshire lawmakers were overpowered. While it was trying to reorganize remotely, Gov. Chris Sununu was taking charge, issuing emergency orders to deal with the pandemic’s fallout. Eviction and foreclosure laws were suspended. Covid-related paid family and medical leave was instituted though unemployment benefits. Nonessential businesses, defined by the governor, were shut down.

Legislators normally hold the power of the purse, but this year $1.25 billion of federal CARES Act funds fell into the governor’s lap, with eight months to spend it.

Even as the Legislature mounted a court challenge, Sununu was already spending money on many of the things the Democratic-controlled Legislature wanted anyway. This was evident when the Senate tried to pass a bill to include $50 million of those CARES Act funds to assist renters after the eviction ban expires at the end of July. The same afternoon of that committee vote, Sununu allocated $35 million for the same purpose, adding that he could always add more. The full Senate meekly dropped the provision.

This go-round, the governor’s office has been where the action is, and lobbyists were paying more attention to (and indeed were sometimes on) various boards advising Sununu on how to spend that money or reopen the economy.

But slowly, lawmakers pieced together some legislation, with many provisions that could profoundly affect the state’s businesses, if they aren’t vetoed.

Here are the highlights.


The prescription drug package — HB 1280 — might have the best chance of avoiding a veto, since Sununu himself testified in favor of two of its provisions, including a bill that would allow wholesale importation of cheaper prescription drugs from Canada. It’s a concept supported by both U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders and President Trump, though the bill could be symbolic, since Canada has thus far been reluctant to agree to such an arrangement.

Despite that, Rick Newman, a lobbyist for the New Hampshire Independent Pharmacists Association, said if the measure is enacted it would be “huge. It may not work, but at least we have the tools, if it does.”

The package also includes a provision — also supported by Sununu — that would create a prescription drug affordability board to determine annual public payor spending targets. It also includes measures aimed at capping the price of insulin at $100 a month and not subjecting it to a deductible, and requiring insurers to cover EpiPens, which are for people with hyper allergic reactions.

“No other state would dare to remove the deductible,” said Rep. John Hunt, R-Rindge. “It will give pharmaceutical companies a blank check to charge whatever they want.”

But Rep. Ed Butler, D-Hart’s Location, called it a “good powerful bill that impacts the price of prescription drugs.” It passed the House by a veto-proof 225-104 vote.

Two other prescription drug bills were passed: one dealing with drug rebates and the other, requiring notices of big price increases, has already been signed by Gov. Sununu.

For the New Hampshire Medical Society, the most crucial package was HB 1623, which focuses on telemedicine — its importance enhanced by the need to deliver services remotely during the pandemic. The bill creates parity, meaning that doctors would get paid the same for an office, video or audio visit.

The legislation still leaves some gray areas, such as whether a provider can charge for a facility that neither doctor nor patient was located in during the visit. “That will be a hotly debated topic for some time to come,” said James Potter, executive vice president of the New Hampshire Medical Society.

The pandemic also put a spotlight on nursing homes, since that’s where 80% of the state’s Covid-19 deaths have occurred, and that led to passage of HB 1246.

It includes $25 million of CARES Act money for enhanced stipends for workers, sets up federal reimbursement of costs of training nursing assistants (currently the nurses can get reimbursed, but the institution that trains them can’t), and sets up an independent review of nursing homes and long-term care in the wake of Covid-19.

Brendan Williams, president of the New Hampshire Health Care Association, which represents long-term care facilities, said that while the training law and the stipend are helpful — given the acute labor shortage — he is ambivalent about the study.

“The Legislature loves to study things,” he said. “But rather than second-guessing, if they wanted to reimburse nursing homes more so we can pay more than poverty wages permanently — not just a one-time grant — that would be nice.”


The pandemic also spotlighted paid family and medical leave, mandated for Covid-related reasons by Sununu, who ordered that taking time off to care for a family member or oneself are legitimate reasons for collecting unemployment benefits. The federal government, which also required it of employers, is reimbursing them through payroll tax reductions.

HB 1116 would make the governor’s family and medical leave order permanent as well as extend unpaid federal Family and Medical Leave Act requirements for Covid-related reasons to businesses with more than 15 employees — the current threshold is 50.

It would also provide personal protective equipment to workers and small businesses, waive coronavirus testing copays and earmark $50 million of federal CARES Act funds to the Department of Employment Security.

The bill also includes a severability clause, in response to criticism that it could endanger millions of dollars in federal funding for the state’s unemployment trust fund. That could drive up unemployment insurance costs, which are already set to rise because of the massive drain on the fund.

Sununu has maintained the measure would “destroy” the state’s unemployment system. The BIA, irked by a provision that would allow workers to collect benefits if they think the workplace is unsafe, is urging the governor to veto it. Such a veto is likely to be sustained, since it only passed the House by a 24-vote margin.

Another measure, HB 712, would allow workers to take up to 12 weeks off in order to care for themselves or a family member suffering from any major illness, to care for a new child or care for an elderly family member. To do this, it would impose a 0.5% payroll deduction on all private employees.

Sununu, who has vetoed similar bills in the past, has denounced the deduction as an income tax, but advocates are hoping the pandemic changed Sununu’s mind or heart.

The bill went to his desk July 8, and the BIA is asking for another veto, arguing that “employers are best equipped to make decisions about employee benefits programs that allow them to attract and retain individuals best suited for their enterprises, not state government.”

Then there’s the minimum wage. The House debate over the wage was framed, like so many others, by the current crisis.

HB 731 would increase the minimum — currently $7.25 an hour, the lowest by far in New England — to $10 per hour in 2021 and $12 per hour in 2023. Sununu has vetoed similar bills in the past, but this bill is different because it sets a fixed $4-an-hour minimum for tipped workers, as opposed to a percentage of the standard minimum. It’s a provision that the New Hampshire Lodging and Restaurant Association had testified for.

“Now, in the time of Covid-19, businesses are all suffering. Costs related to payroll are going up. They can barely survive. Some of them will close if this bill passes,” said Rep. Jack Flanagan, R-Brookline.

“It is the perfect time to raise the minimum wage,” countered Rep. Brian Sullivan, D-Grantham. “All those folks working the front lines will benefit.”


Bills dealing with water pollution — also targeted by BIA for a veto — might have a better chance of surviving.

HB 1264 — passed 23-1 by the Senate — sets maximum levels for perfluorochemicals, or PFAS, for drinking water. It also sets up a $50 million, low-interest loan fund for municipal waste systems affected by PFAS, to be forgiven if the chemical’s manufacturer either settles or loses a multistate suit.

But who knows when and if that will be settled, said opponents. If there is none, that would increase the state’s long-term debt by 7%, jeopardizing its bond rating, said Rep. William Marsh, R-Wolfeboro.

“There is nothing more precious than having the ability to drink clean water,” replied Rep. Renny Cushing, D-Hampton. “Bonding capacity doesn’t equate with human life.”

The House passed the bill, 210-115, still short of a veto-proof majority, but not by much.

The House did OK HB 1375 by more than a two-thirds vote, however it fell short of that threshold in the Senate. That bill would force manufacturers to pay the cost of medical monitoring of those exposed to toxic chemicals — including, but not limited to, PFAS.


The Legislature passed a trio of leftover major energy bills. One of them, Senate Bill 159, was already vetoed and overridden. Another two, SB 122 and SB 124, were passed at the end of the Senate’s session and likely to be vetoed again.

SB 122 would end the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative rebate for residential customers, fully expending it on low-income and municipal energy-efficiency programs. But commercial customers would still get a full rebate. SB 124 would increase the state’s renewable energy goal, currently 25%, to 56% by 2040.

SB 159 would have raised the net metering cap for renewable energy systems from one megawatt to five, allowing political subdivisions and large businesses to participate. But opponents, led by the utilities, argued that the reimbursement rate set by the Public Utilities Commission would increase power rates. The renewable energy industry argued just the opposite.

The Senate voted to override a veto in early March, but the House has yet to vote on it.

“These are the same bills that were vetoed [last year]. Nothing has changed, and we don’t expect the result to change,” said Madeleine Mineau, executive director of Clean Energy NH. She was particularly upset that lawmakers did not come up with a compromise, particularly since Sununu had backed a bill that would have expanded net metering for municipalities, though with conditions not to the organization’s liking.

“It was a small step, but it was better than nothing. I don’t understand why it didn’t move forward,” said Mineau.

Other measures did move forward.

There were two bills tucked into HB 1234, including a provision negotiated with utilities that set the rules for energy storage systems. The omnibus bill also upped the maximum alternative compliance rate that utilities have to pay if they failed to meet renewable energy standards.

Bill Number* Bills approved by the NH Legislature
*Because of the large number of omnibus bills, the bills are split up by subject matter and listed under an omnibus bill like HB 1234 with older bills listed below
HB 1234
(SB 635)
Establishes the lakes region development authority, similar to Pease Development Authority, to redevelop the former Laconia state school.
HB 1558
(SB 661)


Bases the economic revitalization zone tax credits on the jobs created, not the jobs that will be created, and takes out any maximum negotiated amount. As for the New Hampshire college graduate retention incentive partnership, the state would simply certify employee incentives, not negotiate them with the colleges.
HB 705
(SB 679)


Requires colleges to adopt and make available to students policies on sexual misconduct, including developing a task force, establishing resource advisors, programming and training.
HB 1454


Requires the state board of education to set up a process approving vendors offering alternative, extended learning and work-based programs that may be accepted for credit by a local school board.
HB 1234
Requires the Public Utility Commission to promulgate rules on behind the meter energy storage, including possibly setting a rate that utilities must pay for it if it benefits the grid, and prevents utilities from owning behind the meter storage going forward.Increases alternative compliance payment at a maximum of $55 per megawatt hour for utilities that fail to meet renewable portfolio requirements.
HB 1245
Appropriates $102,000 to establish an offshore wind commission, give the state greater latitude in entering clean energy contracts, including power purchase agreements. Revises state energy goals to prioritize public health, environmental quality, not just efficiency.
HB 715


Requires the NH Public Utilities Commission to investigate ways to enable energy storage projects to receive compensation.
SB 159


Increases maximum limits for a net metering project from 1 to 5 megawatts.
SB 122


Ends the RGGI rebate for residential customers and rebates the entire amount to commercial and industrial customers, increasing the amount set aside to low income, municipality and school district efficiency programs.
SB 124


Continues the expansion of renewable portfolio standards, currently 25% renewable by 2025 to 56% by 2040.
SB 166


Adds municipal and county aggregators to provisions governing competitive electricity suppliers for the credit or purchase of electrical supply under net energy metering.
HB 466


Increases the upper limit on a small generator from 100 to 125 kilowatts, allowing more small businesses to get a better reimbursement rate than residential solar.
HB 1558,
Changes the vote required for a town without a town meeting to approve a bond from 2/3 (66.6%) to 3/5 (60%).
HB 1247


Requires landlords offer a six-month payment plan before eviction proceedings, gives rooming house residents tenant protection.
HB 1245
Allows the state marshal to enforce local building codes at the municipalities’ request.
HB 1111
(SB 457,
SB 459,
Allows municipalities to group together and form “communications districts” for the purpose of funding broadband infrastructure; expands the use of broadband infrastructure bonds, allows municipalities to determine locations within the municipality unserved by a broadband provider (even if the provider doesn’t respond to information request) enabling it to provide service.
HB 1182
(HB 2020,
SB 446,
SB 649,
SB 658,
Updates the 10-year transportation improvement plan; allows airport to charge a fee to transportation network companies not taxicab charges; takes away a commercial driving license from those that refuse an blood alcohol test; regulates roadable aircraft on highways and requires the department of transportation to include business impacts in its engineering plans for projects exceeding $5 million.
HB 1234
Requires internet car rentals companies collect and pay the rooms and meals tax.
HB 1264
Sets maximum contaminant limits for perfluorochemicals in drinking water; creates $50 million loan fund to help communities clean up contamination, to be back filled by proceeds from the multistate litigation against the manufacturers, and requires insurance coverage for PFAS blood tests.
HB 1375 Forces manufacturers to pay the cost of medical monitoring of those exposed to toxic chemicals, including but not limited to PFAS.
HB 1234
(HB 1702, HB 1704, SB 591, SB 626)VETOED BY GOVERNOR
Establishes a solid waste working group; requires the Department of Environmental Services make rules about composting meat and animal products; shifts the hard to measure current solid waste goal of 40% recycling and reduction to the more quantifiable goal of 25% disposal reduction in weight compared to 2018 figures by 2030 and 45% by 2050; removes the fee (which can be more than $10,000) to file certain administrative petitions with the site evaluation committee.
HB 1280


Caps the price of a 30-day insulin dosage at $30, not subject to deductible; requires insurance coverage for epinephrine autoinjectors; allows for importation of drugs from Canada, lets the state use a dynamic reverse-auction prices when buying drugs for state health plans, brings generic drugs under the Consumer Protection Act to prevent price gouging, and requires pharmacy benefit managers to respond to prior authorization requests in two days.
SB 63


Requires that drug manufacturers either pass on rebates at the point of sale or demonstrate to the Insurance Department how the received rebates will be used to lower premiums or cost-sharing.
HB 703


Requires prescription drug manufacturers to provide certain notice to the office of the attorney general if they are introducing new high-cost prescription drugs.
HB 1623


Ensures reimbursement parity for telemedicine; enables all providers to provide services through telehealth for Medicaid and commercial health coverage; expands the definition of telemedicine to include audio.n
HB 1162


Requires insurance coverage for children’s early intervention services not be subject to deductible, except with high deductible plans.
HB 250


Institutes dental coverage under Medicaid managed care.
HB 1246


Transfers $25 million of federal CARES money into a COVID-19 long-term care fund; sets up an independent COVID-19 long-term care review; authorizes pharmacists to administer a COVID-19 vaccine and tries to set up federal reimbursement of costs of training nursing assistants.
HB 1520


Establishes a non-lapsing New Hampshire health professionals’ substance abuse recovery program for some 13 regulated professions, funded by licensing fees.
HB 1639


Eliminates prior authorization for emergency care; requires insurance for long-term antibiotic therapy for tick-bourne illness; allows physician assistance to follow advanced directives; sets up an opioid abatement fund from the proceeds of pharmaceutical litigation and also authorizes pharmacists to administer a Covid-19 vaccine.
HB 712


Imposes a 0.5% payroll deduction on all private employees in order to provide workers with 60% of their wages if they take up to 12 weeks off in order to care for themselves or a family member.
HB 731


Increases the minimum wage to $10 per hour in 2021 and $12 per hour in 2023, and sets tipped minimum at $4 an hour (rather than a percentage of regular minimum).
HB 1166


Extends coved-related eligibility expansions for unemployment; extends the federal unpaid family and medical leave act to business with more than 15 employees (as oppose to 50); waives cost sharing for Covid-19 testing; requires employers provide sanitary conditions relating to Covid-19 and requires the state provide employers with 15 or fewer employees free personal protective equipment.
Categories: Government