Where does home affordability go from here?
Index of affordability in New Hampshire tied for poorest showing in 2025
Sections
Extras
Connect With Us
In mid-May, the U.S. House of Representatives passed its version of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for fiscal year 2017, and recently the U.S. Senate followed suit. The NDAA is the federal law that lays out the annual budget and expenditures for the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), including all branches of the military.
Both the House and Senate versions of the NDAA included language instructing the U.S. Department of Defense to adhere to a long-established law known as the Berry Amendment. First passed in 1941, the Berry Amendment requires DOD to purchase — to the greatest extent possible – American-made clothing and textiles for U.S. soldiers.
Unfortunately, for more than a decade, DOD has not abided by this rule with respect to training shoes for new recruits. Since FY 2002, DOD has instead provided new recruits with cash allowances to purchase training shoes, which are not required to be American-made. The explanation: DOD asserted that it was difficult to find suitable athletic footwear that was made entirely in the United States.
However in recent years, American companies, such as New England’s own New Balance and Saucony, have made significant financial investments in equipment in order to produce footwear that is 100 percent American-made, and therefore fully compliant with the Berry Amendment.
In adding this Berry Amendment language to the NDAA, Congress has sent a clear message that DOD needs to drop their reasoning for circumventing the law, buy American with regard to training shoes, and support U.S. manufacturing jobs.
Here in New England, New Balance employs some 1,400 people at five manufacturing facilities throughout the region. When and if DOD follows the Berry Amendment and purchases American-made recruit training shoes, American companies like New Balance could compete for work to produce some 150,000 pairs of shoes for the military, potentially adding even more valuable New England jobs.
Inclusion of this important provision in the NDAA is the result of a strong bipartisan effort on the part of several New England lawmakers.
The law on this matter is clear, and it has been on the books for 75 years. The time has come for DOD to listen to Congress and follow the Berry Amendment — to ensure that our troops are wearing “Made in the USA” shoes as they train to defend our country and in doing so support American jobs.
James T. Brett is CEO of The New England Council.
Index of affordability in New Hampshire tied for poorest showing in 2025
New Hampshire should insist that its citizens receive surgery from properly trained surgeons by asking legislators to reject HB 349
HB 155 would cut the Business Enterprise Tax by 0.05%. On paper, that sounds “pro-business.” In reality, it’s a distraction that saves most businesses pennies while pulling an estimated $23 million out of an already strained state budget, says small business owner Jesse Lore.
As 2025 comes to an end, many Granite Staters are feeling the same things. Groceries cost more. Housing costs and property taxes are up. Health care is harder to afford and access.
How to build a stronger entrepreneurial ecosystem
Achieving financial independence — that is, living comfortably while knowing your money will last — is a goal shared by many.
Real estate transactions in New Hampshire invariably carry tax consequences. Whether you are a business owner, investor, or advisor, thoughtful tax planning is critical to preserving value and avoiding costly missteps.
Since 2020, our research team at the University of New Hampshire — the New Hampshire Youth Retention Initiative (YRI) — has been studying how young people view the Granite State as a place to live, learn and work.
The people of New Hampshire are facing unprecedented economic challenges — no one has been spared from rising grocery bills, increased rent and utility costs, and even higher car insurance premiums.