How the new law applies to two-member LLCs

Two-member LLCs are like marriages -- their biggest problems involve incompatibility


Published:

There are currently about 48,000 New Hampshire limited liability companies. IRS filing statistics indicate that while about 55 percent have one member, a good 40 percent have only two, and only about 5 percent have three or more.

The Business and Industry Association committee that drafted the Revised New Hampshire Limited Liability Company Act (of which I was chair) was aware that, next to single-member LLCs, the roughly 19,000 New Hampshire two-member LLCs and the many tens of thousands of New Hampshire two-member LLCs that will be formed in future years were by far its key constituency.

Two-member LLCs are like marriages. The biggest problems of two-member LLCs are not usually LLC business or financial problems, as severe as these may sometimes be. The biggest problems are those that involve member incompatibility.

The drafting committee sought to deal with this problem in two main ways. First, it sought to ensure that the mandatory and default rules of the revised act addressed as comprehensively and wisely as possible the LLC legal problems likely to arise between the members of two-member LLCs.

Above all, we sought to address all of the fiduciary issues likely to arise between these members, since we knew that it is these problems that are the greatest single destroyers of two-member LLCs. Fiduciary issues include, above all, issues concerning the members’ duties toward one another to work carefully and to be loyal.

As I’ve written before, the revised act contains, in Sections 106 through 117, the most comprehensive and, in my view, the most commonsensical fiduciary rules of any U.S. LLC act.

The second thing our committee did in order to meet the needs of our two-member LLC constituency was to provide dispute resolution provisions in that, if the members of these LLCs simply couldn’t work with each other any more, would provide them with the fairest possible resolution of their deadlock in the New Hampshire courts.

The main anti-deadlock provision in the revised act is Section 104, entitled “Judicial Removal of a Member.” Section 104 permits any member of a multi-member LLC, including a two-member LLC, to request a New Hampshire court to remove another member if:

 • The other member has breached or may breach a duty to the LLC

 • The other member has engaged or may engage in any other conduct that has injured the LLC or may injury it

 • The other member has engaged or may engage in any conduct that makes it difficult to carry on the activities of the LLC -- including, for example, being hopelessly difficult to work with.

Furthermore, Section 104 permits New Hampshire courts, in resolving disputes between LLC members, to exercise tremendous discretion.

For example, assume that Member A of two-member AB LLC, asks a court to remove Member B for incompatibility. Section 104 gives the court the right to remove Member B but also to make Member A buy out Member B and also, believe it or not, to remove Member A.

In view of the almost unlimited discretion of New Hampshire courts under Section 104, I’m hoping that neither Member A nor Member B will ever want to invoke Section 104 unless they absolutely have to. Instead, given the risks to both of them under that section, I’m hoping the section will force them to somehow work things out.

I can’t resist one final point: What if, when they form their LLC, A and B, by themselves or with the help of an LLC lawyer, put together a comprehensive written LLC operating agreement and both of them sign it? If they do this, maybe they can avoid major disputes.

Attorney John Cunningham, of counsel to the Manchester-based law firm of McLane, Graf, Raulerson & Middleton, is author of "John Cunningham on New Hampshire's New LLC Act," available at cunninghamonnhllcs.com.

Edit ModuleShow Tags